What was the argument against the Indian Removal Act?

What was the argument against the Indian Removal Act?

Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.

Who was opposed to the Indian Removal Act?

The Cherokee Nation, led by Principal Chief John Ross, resisted the Indian Removal Act, even in the face of assaults on its sovereign rights by the state of Georgia and violence against Cherokee people.

What were the negative effects of the Indian Removal Act?

A number of negative results would occur including disease, loss of land, and loss right of self-governing, with no remorse to Native American culture.

What are Jackson’s arguments regarding Indian Removal?

Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”

Who opposed the Trail of Tears?

Opposition to the removal was led by Chief John Ross, a mixed-blood of Scottish and one-eighth Cherokee descent.

What argument did Andrew Jackson used to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision?

Terms in this set (5) Which argument did Andrew Jackson use to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision? Removing American Indians will alow white settlers to become wealthier.

Why would the Cherokees be particularly opposed to removal?

Why would the Cherokees be particularly opposed to removal from their land? Because they claimed they had established their own nation, with their own constitution. They claimed status as a separate nation and didn’t feel the US government had the right to force them to move.

How did the natives react to the Indian Removal Act?

A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy. During the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, the Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the United States government. Approximately 4,000 Cherokees died on this forced march, which became known as the “Trail of Tears.”

Why did Daniel Webster oppose the Indian Removal Act?

Webster also opposed Jackson’s implementation of the “spoils system” and his harsh treatment of Native Americans; in particular, Webster opposed the Indian Removal Act of 1830.

Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?

The Removal Act would benefit white settlement and allow the country’s citizens to inhabit up and down the eastern coast. This included certain southern states such as Georgia and Florida, which was recently acquired from the Spanish.

What were some consequences of the Trail of Tears?

The Cherokee people called this journey the “Trail of Tears,” because of its devastating effects. The migrants faced hunger, disease, and exhaustion on the forced march. Over 4,000 out of 15,000 of the Cherokees died.

Which statement best describes the consequences of the Indian Removal Act?

Which statement best describes the consequences of the Indian Removal Act? Under pressure, most Native American groups eventually moved west of the Mississippi.

What was Andrew Jackson’s opinion on the Trail of Tears?

Andrew Jackson had long been an advocate of what he called “Indian removal.” As an Army general, he had spent years leading brutal campaigns against the Creeks in Georgia and Alabama and the Seminoles in Florida–campaigns that resulted in the transfer of hundreds of thousands of acres of land from Indian nations to …

Did people try to stop the Trail of Tears?

In response, more than 1,400 women signed petitions protesting the forcible removal of Native people from their lands. This marked the first time groups of women appealed collectively to the federal government.

How did the Cherokee resist the Indian Removal Act?

From 1817 to 1827, the Cherokees effectively resisted ceding their full territory by creating a new form of tribal government based on the United States government. Rather than being governed by a traditional tribal council, the Cherokees wrote a constitution and created a two-house legislature.

How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?

How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.

What was the purpose of Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian Removal quizlet?

President Andrew Jackson gave a message on the Indian Removal Act on December 6, 1830. He wanted to tell Congress/ convince Congress that the Native Americans needed to be moved West of the Mississippi River so that the land could be used by the white Americans.

What did Jackson see as the benefits of the Indian Removal Act?

What does Jackson name as the advantages of the Indian Removal Act for Native Americans? By separating them from whites, Native Americans would be free from the power of the U.S. government. He believes it would allow their tribes to live according to their own ways in peace, thus reducing their decline.